Wednesday, January 21, 2009

some naughty uniformed fun


I've been shying away from photos with erections -- not that there's anything wrong with them (in fact, there is absolutely nothing wrong with an erection!) -- but I've been keeping on the "respectable" side of things, if you will. Would you like to see more of these kind of "secret" photos of the 50's/60's here from time to time?
at

16 comments:

  1. keifster aka markJanuary 23, 2009 at 9:30 AM

    YES! your blog is invaluable

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJanuary 23, 2009 at 4:02 PM

    Please continue to mix erection shots in from time to time.
    The more 'risque' images are an important facet of photographic history, given the strict censorship laws of the time.

    ...and wieners are fun to look at.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJanuary 27, 2009 at 10:15 PM

    Hell yea! I didn't even realize pictures with erect models existed. All I've seen from the period are either nude or (even more usual) with posing straps. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Russ ManleyJanuary 29, 2009 at 7:50 AM

    Yeah sure, why not? The vintage boners are pretty rare, so that's a treat.

    ReplyDelete
  5. LarryFebruary 6, 2009 at 3:19 PM

    YES YES YES

    Where can I find more pics like this?

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousMarch 1, 2009 at 1:31 AM

    Anyway, Alan, yeah whatever you think; straps did come down, and just look at that beautiful scan of Kim Fox!!! (thnx!)

    A bonehard Robirds leering into the lens is kinda hard to resist---as a 'type'. Not my thing really.

    Ben B (FrankinFrisco)

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousMarch 8, 2009 at 4:10 PM

    YES!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. morffyneMarch 15, 2009 at 11:42 PM

    yes, please..

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousMarch 24, 2009 at 6:48 PM

    I have to agree with what the first 'anonymous' wrote. Photos with erections are a part of the history of Physique Photography and should be included as such. To purposly exclude them for any well-intentioned reason misrepresents the complete expose of both the photographer's and the model's (hard) work. (No pun intended.)

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousMarch 26, 2009 at 6:38 PM

    Yes!!! More erections and even action shots. My great uncle was gay and "out", at least as out as one could be in the between the wars era, and he always said more went on than any of us ever knew. Photographic evidence that we were very sexually active and adventurous as a people is important historically, and erotic to boot!

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousJuly 8, 2009 at 4:24 PM

    Love the erections! Keep 'em coming!

    ReplyDelete
  12. AnonymousApril 1, 2010 at 5:28 PM

    At first glance this guy looked like Bob Crane from Hogans Heros.

    Yeah it is good to mix some of the more hard core in from time to time. It is an important part of the history of gay photography. Just as the full nudes vs the posing straped men are.

    ReplyDelete
  13. AnonymousApril 9, 2010 at 6:13 PM

    LOVE the vintage boner! I drool over every one you post!

    ReplyDelete
  14. BBGApril 24, 2010 at 6:08 AM

    A useless question my dear! of course we do!we do!! we doooo!!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. AnonymousFebruary 25, 2011 at 5:06 PM

    lots more erections please

    ReplyDelete
  16. dannyguardJune 16, 2012 at 9:59 PM

    Por favor!, incluye mas fotos de modelos con erección, se ven mucho más sexys, primero, en estado de flaccidez, luego, con erección, y después, incluye algunas con masturbación, pleaseeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete